New IEEE Scandals: One more pseudo-conference and pseudo-academic society is supported by IEEE.

One more pseudo-conference and pseudo-academic society is supported by IEEE. The SAI, one more bogus and fake organization with only and only one target: your pocket
They have received real Sponsorship from IEEE.
What does it mean? Obviously one more IEEE Fake, Bogus Conference. One more IEEE Scandal!Send an email to IEEE and report this IEEE Scam Conference.

Let's explain to you:
http://thesai.org/SAIConference2014/CallforPapers
This organization SAI http://www.thesai.org is fake and bogus because

a) They claim that their conference is co-organized by Springer Verlag. This is false and misleading.
Springer Verlag cannot be a co-organizer of this completely unknown organization conference.

b) They do not have committees and send SPAM to recruit dupes as Chairmen, Committees, Reviewers etc.
Check it: http://thesai.org/SAIConference2014/Apply

They say: "We believe that collectively, the conference chiars [sic], managers [sic], reviewers, and manuscript author [sic] can contribute to the advancement of technology by ensuring that the review process is among

c) This organization is without Chairman, without President, without Editorial Boards. Nothing! Who is behind the SAI? Who are the clever tricky guy that makes money from innocent or not so innocent (law-level 3rd world scholars that are far from the main stream)

d) They have two journals and they claim that they are Indexed by ISI. You can check that they are not indexed in ISI. Obviously these are bogus and predatory journals: http://thesai.org/

Our Publications

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications

ISSN : 2156-5570(Online)

International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence

ISSN : 2165-4069(Online)

Bogus IEEE Conferences. How many SCIgen paper in IEEE Xplore ? A 2013 scientometrics paper demonstrated that at least 85 SCIgen papers have been published by IEEE.http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf

Prominent results for Bogus IEEE Conferences.

In 2005 a paper generated by SCIgen, Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy was accepted as a non-reviewed paper to the 2005 WMSCI and the authors were invited to speak. The authors of SCIgen described their hoax on their website, and it soon received great publicity when picked up by Slashdot WMSCI withdrew their invitation, but the SCIgen team went anyway, renting space in the hotel separately from the conference and delivering a series of randomly generated talks on their own "track." The organizer of all these conferences is Professor Nagib Callaos. The WMSCI was also sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers from 2000 until 2005. The IEEE stopped granting sponsorship to Callaos from 2006 to 2008. Submitting the paper was a deliberate attempt to embarrass WMSCI, which the authors claim accepts low-quality papers and sends unsolicited requests for submissions in bulk to academics. As the SCIgen website states:lt;/ref> }} Computing writer Stan Kelly-Bootle noted in [[ACM Queue]]that many sentences in the "Rooter" paper were individually plausible, which he regarded as posing a problem for automated detection of hoax articles. He suggested that even human readers might be taken in by the effective use of jargon ("The pun on root/router is par for MIT-graduate humor, and at least one occurrence of methodology is mandatory") and attribute the papers apparent incoherence to their own limited knowledge. His conclusion was that "a reliable gibberish filter requires a careful holistic review by several peer domain experts".lt;/ref>

List of works with notable acceptance in IEEE Bogus Congresses.

* Rob Thomas: Rooter: A Methodology for the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy 2005 for WMSCI (see above) * Mathias Uslars paper was accepted to the IPSI-BG conference.lt;/ref> * Professor Genco Gulan published a paper in the 3rd International Symposium of Interactive Media Design.lt;/ref> * Students at Iran s Sharif University of Technology published a paper in the Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation (which is published by Elsevier.lt;/ref> The students wrote under the false, non-Persian surname, MosallahNejad, which translates literally from Persian, in spite of being "non-Persian" as: "from an Armed Breed". The paper was subsequently removed when the publishers were informed that it was a joke paper.lt;/ref> * A paper titled "Towards the Simulation of E-Commerce" by Herbert Schlangemann got accepted as a reviewed paper at the "International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering" (CSSE) and was briefly in the IEEE Xplore Database.lt;/ref> The author is named after the Swedish short film Der Schlangemann Furthermore the author was invited to be a session chair during the conference.lt;/ref> Read the official Herbert Schlangemann Blog for details.lt;/ref> The official review comment: "This paper presents cooperative technology and classical Communication. In conclusion, the result shows that though the much-touted amphibious algorithm for the refinement of randomized algorithms is impossible, the well-known client-server algorithm for the analysis of voice-over-IP by Kumar and Raman runs in _(n) time. The authors can clearly identify important features of visualization of DHTs and analyze them insightfully. It is recommended that the authors should develop ideas more cogently, organizes them more logically, and connects them with clear transitions" * Mikhail Gelfand published a translation of the "Rooter" article in the Russian-language Journal of Scientific Publications of Aspirants and Doctorantsin August 2008. Gelfand was protesting against the journal, which was apparently not peer reviewed and was being used by Russian PhD candidates to publish in an "accredited" scientific journal, charging them 4000 Rubles to do so. The accreditation was revoked two weeks later.lt;/ref>lt;/ref>lt;/ref>lt;/ref>lt;/ref>

Spoofing Google Scholar and h-index calculators

A 2010 paper by Cyril Labbe from Joseph Fourier University demonstrated the vulnerability of h-index calculations based on Google Scholar output by feeding it a large set of SCIgen-generated documents that were citing each other (effectively an academic link farm . Using this method the author managed to rank "Ike Antkare" ahead of Albert Einstein for instance.http://rr.liglab.fr/research_report/RR-LIG-008.pdf

How many SCIgen paper in IEEE Xplore ?

A 2013 scientometrics paper demonstrated that at least 85 SCIgen papers have been published by IEEE.http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf

See also: http://www.marketing.reachinformation.com/SCIgen.aspx

IEEE-Dump Junk, Bogus Conferences

http://garbageconferences.blogspot.com

View: http://garbageconferences.blogspot.com/2013/01/ieee-dump.html

Hamid Arabnia bogus conferences

There has been doubt about the quality of the Worldcomp series of conferences organized annually by Hamid Arabnia. Numerous complaints could be found over the internet. A google search with the keyword "hamid arabnia bogus conference" lists a number of such accuses.

See: http://garbageconferences.blogspot.com
and http://jeffreybeall.blogspot.com

IOSR Journals: Predatory, Bogus, Junk, Mock Publisher

The genuine and original list of FAKE PUBLISHERS and FAKE JOURNALS

IOSR Journals: Predatory, Bogus, Junk, Mock Publisher

IOSR fake and bogus activities:

We have just added in our black list IOSR Journals: Predatory, Bogus, Junk, Mock Publisher
http://iosrjournals.org/indexing.html
To publish in these ridiculous journals of IOSR, you must pay a fee: http://iosrjournals.org/how-to-pay-fees.html

View also: http://iosrjournals.org/manuscript-publication.html

Avoid any connection with this hoax, scam, deception of IOSR. Do not include any possible publication of IOSR in your CV, because you will destroy your academic evolution. IOSR is also falsification and imitation of the well-known and reputable IOS Press. Be far from IOSR and any related IOSR scholarly activity.

IOSR publications are junk, fake, bogus. Interrupt any relation with IOSR and put it in your black list.

All Fake Journals

List